<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Part 7: United Kingdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/</link>
	<description>Counterculture. Faith. Love.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Marin</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Marin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>James – For this UK journal article that I did (in what this series is based on), my responses had to be brief to fit within their periodical. With that said, I gave them my general (and short version) of my missiological framework—one that includes sin being equal in God’s eyes. James 2:10 is so important for the conservative community to understand because in the majority of conservative churches and the believers there-within, there is a clear hierarchy of sins from ‘greatest sin’ all the way to ‘least sin’. 

If anything throughout the whole of Scripture, the greatest sin is repeatedly written about as ‘turning away from God’ – and this sin has the most far reaching earthly and eternal consequences: way more than any others, including 1 Cor 6:12-20 that you reference. 

Therefore I am not being circumspect in my analysis. 

Just because we have the ‘capitol T’ Truth, doesn’t mean we can fling it around without reverence to other’s current situation thinking we’re doing them, us or God any good by potentially just throwing something out there. We have to earn the right to speak our Truth; something we haven’t done in most cases. Whether anyone listens to our Truth or not; that is not the point. We think way more highly of our own opinions and beliefs than does anyone else on the outside! Let’s put that in perspective first. 

In the last chapter of my book I talk about &quot;EARNING THE RIGHT TO HAVE DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS&quot;… therefore I am not avoiding anything as you so claim.

James 2:10 is a part of humbly working towards that ‘earning’ process; starting with our own mindset of not ‘loving the sinner and hating the sin’ but ‘loving the sinner and hating the sin in your own life’. Matthew 7 is also a great place to start. None of this means you can never communicate what you belief; you just have to earn the right to do so first.

Iphimedia – I am truly humbled by your words. Thank you – you give ME hope!

Sue – pm is one of the most theologically deep people I’ve ever come across, and I’m privileged he found, and comments on this blog. His insights are profound and I encourage anyone who needs clarity from him, please, just ask and he’ll break you off a piece of deepness. Thanks for your analysis pm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James – For this UK journal article that I did (in what this series is based on), my responses had to be brief to fit within their periodical. With that said, I gave them my general (and short version) of my missiological framework—one that includes sin being equal in God’s eyes. James 2:10 is so important for the conservative community to understand because in the majority of conservative churches and the believers there-within, there is a clear hierarchy of sins from ‘greatest sin’ all the way to ‘least sin’. </p>
<p>If anything throughout the whole of Scripture, the greatest sin is repeatedly written about as ‘turning away from God’ – and this sin has the most far reaching earthly and eternal consequences: way more than any others, including 1 Cor 6:12-20 that you reference. </p>
<p>Therefore I am not being circumspect in my analysis. </p>
<p>Just because we have the ‘capitol T’ Truth, doesn’t mean we can fling it around without reverence to other’s current situation thinking we’re doing them, us or God any good by potentially just throwing something out there. We have to earn the right to speak our Truth; something we haven’t done in most cases. Whether anyone listens to our Truth or not; that is not the point. We think way more highly of our own opinions and beliefs than does anyone else on the outside! Let’s put that in perspective first. </p>
<p>In the last chapter of my book I talk about &#8220;EARNING THE RIGHT TO HAVE DIFFICULT CONVERSATIONS&#8221;… therefore I am not avoiding anything as you so claim.</p>
<p>James 2:10 is a part of humbly working towards that ‘earning’ process; starting with our own mindset of not ‘loving the sinner and hating the sin’ but ‘loving the sinner and hating the sin in your own life’. Matthew 7 is also a great place to start. None of this means you can never communicate what you belief; you just have to earn the right to do so first.</p>
<p>Iphimedia – I am truly humbled by your words. Thank you – you give ME hope!</p>
<p>Sue – pm is one of the most theologically deep people I’ve ever come across, and I’m privileged he found, and comments on this blog. His insights are profound and I encourage anyone who needs clarity from him, please, just ask and he’ll break you off a piece of deepness. Thanks for your analysis pm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2417</link>
		<dc:creator>pm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 09:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2417</guid>
		<description>Sue, thank you for your two questions. I hope my explanations are clear.

What is &quot;Gender Culture&quot;?

Andrew Marin wrote in LIAO Chapter 3 page 62:
&quot;A great friend of The Marin Foundation is a former professor
of mine, Dr. John Fuder, who always teaches the importance
of exegeting the culture.  We have to go to the culture before
we know the culture, and for most of us this comes in slowly
taken smaller steps towards involvement.&quot;

Again he wrote page 63:
&quot;Preparatory prayer and a humbled mindset of learning and
serving release much of the fear of trying to single-handedly
pave a path to make a new culture.&quot;

Adding to this Chp5pg84:
&quot;The GLBT community has tended to look to others for legitimacy
regarding who they are and what sexual behaviors they have
- whether that validation comes from other gays and lesbians,
from sections of the religious community or from mainstream
culture.&quot;

When I add these quotations together, it suggests:
[GLBT community] + [validation sections] + [mainstream]
equals = &quot;Gender Culture&quot;

Why is &quot;Gender Culture&quot; a problem if it enters the Church?

Andrew wrote Chp3pg57:
&quot;Over the years shame has been passed down through secular
culture surrounding gays and lesbians. That shame has also
imbedded itself in the core of the church. The overarching stigma
felt by GLBT people with the church is continually brought to
light by the ingrained cultural psyche that shame is supposed
to be the inherent, default feeling for all who have a same-sex
attraction - Christian or non-Christian.&quot;

A similarity emergies in how our modern day Church Culture
shames the Gender Culture just as the 1st Century believers
who were born Jewish struggled bringing into the Kingdom
of God those who were not born Jewish (i.e., Gentiles).

Thankfully, the 1st Century Church leaders elevated their own
conversations so circumcision became a matter of the inward-heart
and not of the flesh. Perhaps the 21st Century Church can also
elevate our conversations as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue, thank you for your two questions. I hope my explanations are clear.</p>
<p>What is &#8220;Gender Culture&#8221;?</p>
<p>Andrew Marin wrote in LIAO Chapter 3 page 62:<br />
&#8220;A great friend of The Marin Foundation is a former professor<br />
of mine, Dr. John Fuder, who always teaches the importance<br />
of exegeting the culture.  We have to go to the culture before<br />
we know the culture, and for most of us this comes in slowly<br />
taken smaller steps towards involvement.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again he wrote page 63:<br />
&#8220;Preparatory prayer and a humbled mindset of learning and<br />
serving release much of the fear of trying to single-handedly<br />
pave a path to make a new culture.&#8221;</p>
<p>Adding to this Chp5pg84:<br />
&#8220;The GLBT community has tended to look to others for legitimacy<br />
regarding who they are and what sexual behaviors they have<br />
- whether that validation comes from other gays and lesbians,<br />
from sections of the religious community or from mainstream<br />
culture.&#8221;</p>
<p>When I add these quotations together, it suggests:<br />
[GLBT community] + [validation sections] + [mainstream]<br />
equals = &#8220;Gender Culture&#8221;</p>
<p>Why is &#8220;Gender Culture&#8221; a problem if it enters the Church?</p>
<p>Andrew wrote Chp3pg57:<br />
&#8220;Over the years shame has been passed down through secular<br />
culture surrounding gays and lesbians. That shame has also<br />
imbedded itself in the core of the church. The overarching stigma<br />
felt by GLBT people with the church is continually brought to<br />
light by the ingrained cultural psyche that shame is supposed<br />
to be the inherent, default feeling for all who have a same-sex<br />
attraction &#8211; Christian or non-Christian.&#8221;</p>
<p>A similarity emergies in how our modern day Church Culture<br />
shames the Gender Culture just as the 1st Century believers<br />
who were born Jewish struggled bringing into the Kingdom<br />
of God those who were not born Jewish (i.e., Gentiles).</p>
<p>Thankfully, the 1st Century Church leaders elevated their own<br />
conversations so circumcision became a matter of the inward-heart<br />
and not of the flesh. Perhaps the 21st Century Church can also<br />
elevate our conversations as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sue</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2415</link>
		<dc:creator>sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2415</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by &quot;gender culture&quot; pm and why is it a problem if that enters the church?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by &#8220;gender culture&#8221; pm and why is it a problem if that enters the church?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2414</link>
		<dc:creator>pm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2414</guid>
		<description>Jesus spent time on relationships so they might enter into
The Kingdom of God; no one ever asked Jesus to stop preaching
or teaching daily except those who wanted to keep their power
roles intact; they didn&#039;t mind the miracles and it was OK to
continue doing good unless it was on the wrong day of the
week; repeated attempts for finding legit-loopholes failed as
their inward parts were clearly viewed as well as revealed
from the perspective of who they were actually serving within
the context of their own motivation; some had their reward
already from this life; it was harder for a rich-man to enter
The Kingdom of God than those in their society considered
as a sinner. He invited all to enter, but many left when they
learned what the cost was all about; how can we stop serving
ourself, especially when our needs and wants are in control?
If He asks us to lay-down our life, then how are we suppose
to survive and/or thrive in this life? Isn&#039;t that why Paul was
accused of being mad when considering how he lived and
taught? If the Gentiles could inherit the Kingdom of God
then was the Covenant to the Jews violated? If the Gender
Culture can enter the Kingdom of God, then is the New
Covenant to the Church violated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus spent time on relationships so they might enter into<br />
The Kingdom of God; no one ever asked Jesus to stop preaching<br />
or teaching daily except those who wanted to keep their power<br />
roles intact; they didn&#8217;t mind the miracles and it was OK to<br />
continue doing good unless it was on the wrong day of the<br />
week; repeated attempts for finding legit-loopholes failed as<br />
their inward parts were clearly viewed as well as revealed<br />
from the perspective of who they were actually serving within<br />
the context of their own motivation; some had their reward<br />
already from this life; it was harder for a rich-man to enter<br />
The Kingdom of God than those in their society considered<br />
as a sinner. He invited all to enter, but many left when they<br />
learned what the cost was all about; how can we stop serving<br />
ourself, especially when our needs and wants are in control?<br />
If He asks us to lay-down our life, then how are we suppose<br />
to survive and/or thrive in this life? Isn&#8217;t that why Paul was<br />
accused of being mad when considering how he lived and<br />
taught? If the Gentiles could inherit the Kingdom of God<br />
then was the Covenant to the Jews violated? If the Gender<br />
Culture can enter the Kingdom of God, then is the New<br />
Covenant to the Church violated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iphimedia</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2413</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphimedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2413</guid>
		<description>Andrew when I first read above that you find same sex behavior sinful, it gave me a jolt and hurt me, though I knew it from reading your book. I shouldn&#039;t have been surprised. I know the difference you see between affirmation and validation of my life and loves as a bisexual woman. However, once I got over my initial reaction-I admire and respect you, and so who wouldn&#039;t want such a person&#039;s approval?--I see that this very fact that you see my behavior as sinful gives me hope. Actually, in my case potential behavior because by circumstance I have lived celibate for a number of years--anyway, the fact that you believe my potential behavior is sinful, yet act humbly in love and not in judgement, without usurping God&#039;s job description, gives me hope of dialogue and reconciliation. As a liberal Christian bisexual woman I too believe that many things that conservative Christian clergy and church member in general do and believe is &quot;wrong&quot;--yet I can meet you on the bridge of my belief with you that Jesus&#039; overall message, call, to His followers is to love our neighbors and God, and not to judge. That is the perogative of God. So when I find myself judging something a conservative Christian is doing or saying, I can say to myself, &quot;Despite my personal convictions, how can I live out Jesus&#039; message of love toward this person, in mind and spirit, in prayer, and preferably in action if they are nearby?&quot; That is what your bridge building work has taught me: that I can hold my convictions and beliefs, honor my own conscience, yet leave remember my true, humble yet difficult, awesome, tiring, and fearsome calling before God: to love my love for God in my love for my neighbors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew when I first read above that you find same sex behavior sinful, it gave me a jolt and hurt me, though I knew it from reading your book. I shouldn&#8217;t have been surprised. I know the difference you see between affirmation and validation of my life and loves as a bisexual woman. However, once I got over my initial reaction-I admire and respect you, and so who wouldn&#8217;t want such a person&#8217;s approval?&#8211;I see that this very fact that you see my behavior as sinful gives me hope. Actually, in my case potential behavior because by circumstance I have lived celibate for a number of years&#8211;anyway, the fact that you believe my potential behavior is sinful, yet act humbly in love and not in judgement, without usurping God&#8217;s job description, gives me hope of dialogue and reconciliation. As a liberal Christian bisexual woman I too believe that many things that conservative Christian clergy and church member in general do and believe is &#8220;wrong&#8221;&#8211;yet I can meet you on the bridge of my belief with you that Jesus&#8217; overall message, call, to His followers is to love our neighbors and God, and not to judge. That is the perogative of God. So when I find myself judging something a conservative Christian is doing or saying, I can say to myself, &#8220;Despite my personal convictions, how can I live out Jesus&#8217; message of love toward this person, in mind and spirit, in prayer, and preferably in action if they are nearby?&#8221; That is what your bridge building work has taught me: that I can hold my convictions and beliefs, honor my own conscience, yet leave remember my true, humble yet difficult, awesome, tiring, and fearsome calling before God: to love my love for God in my love for my neighbors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Wartian</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2412</link>
		<dc:creator>James Wartian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2412</guid>
		<description>Your statement that all sins are equal is true in terms of the fact that they all equally lead to a break in our relationship with God. It is true that no sin is worse in God&#039;s eyes than another -- they all are equally an act that cuts us off from the source of life, God himself.

But the effect of sin is not equal. If I were to lie and say I read my Bible today, the effect is not the same as if I got out a gun and shot you. 

God is clear that the effect of sexual sin is unique (1 Corinthians 6). We might debate exactly what that means, but if it is true, that leaves me with a tension. I agree with your goal to build bridges. I agree that we should love gay individuals.Yet if sexual sin does have an impact that is harmful to them (and, I would argue, to society), I feel like I can&#039;t be quite as circumspect as you in saying it is wrong. 

Clearly evangelical Christians have a long way to go in balancing these things. And  I don&#039;t feel we have to beat anyone with a sin issue with the fact what they are doing is sin. But I am not sure avoiding saying something is actually anymore loving. 

Your thoughts?

James</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your statement that all sins are equal is true in terms of the fact that they all equally lead to a break in our relationship with God. It is true that no sin is worse in God&#8217;s eyes than another &#8212; they all are equally an act that cuts us off from the source of life, God himself.</p>
<p>But the effect of sin is not equal. If I were to lie and say I read my Bible today, the effect is not the same as if I got out a gun and shot you. </p>
<p>God is clear that the effect of sexual sin is unique (1 Corinthians 6). We might debate exactly what that means, but if it is true, that leaves me with a tension. I agree with your goal to build bridges. I agree that we should love gay individuals.Yet if sexual sin does have an impact that is harmful to them (and, I would argue, to society), I feel like I can&#8217;t be quite as circumspect as you in saying it is wrong. </p>
<p>Clearly evangelical Christians have a long way to go in balancing these things. And  I don&#8217;t feel we have to beat anyone with a sin issue with the fact what they are doing is sin. But I am not sure avoiding saying something is actually anymore loving. </p>
<p>Your thoughts?</p>
<p>James</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Marin</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2408</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Marin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to post this from my phone, as I&#039;m in the airport right now...hope it works.

Peter - That is true, I do believe in a conservative interpretation of Scripture; I just live out those beliefs totally different than almost all of the people who believe like I do. It&#039;s because I understand, and live within my Kingdom job description: Holy Spirit&#039;s job to convict, God&#039;s job to judge and mine to love. The interesting part for me is that whether a liberal or conservative interpretation, shouldn&#039;t we all be living it out the right way? People are shocked that I am conservative because since I believe such a thing, how then can I have such an impact/influence in the gay community as in the conservative world...because that shouldn&#039;t happen. But the Lord has solidly built this thing through my incarnational comittment to build bridges among; within. No one can build a bridge from one side - it takes both sides. And that is what I try to relentlessly model everyday within the gay community. I&#039;m stepping out on my side, and &#039;crazy enough&#039; the gay community is responding to that boldness by boldly doing the same thing from theirs. And here we are today. It&#039;s a shame to me that my theological belief in comparrison to how I live my life is so odd to most people. It should be the norm. Because from my perspective that is Kingdom stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to post this from my phone, as I&#8217;m in the airport right now&#8230;hope it works.</p>
<p>Peter &#8211; That is true, I do believe in a conservative interpretation of Scripture; I just live out those beliefs totally different than almost all of the people who believe like I do. It&#8217;s because I understand, and live within my Kingdom job description: Holy Spirit&#8217;s job to convict, God&#8217;s job to judge and mine to love. The interesting part for me is that whether a liberal or conservative interpretation, shouldn&#8217;t we all be living it out the right way? People are shocked that I am conservative because since I believe such a thing, how then can I have such an impact/influence in the gay community as in the conservative world&#8230;because that shouldn&#8217;t happen. But the Lord has solidly built this thing through my incarnational comittment to build bridges among; within. No one can build a bridge from one side &#8211; it takes both sides. And that is what I try to relentlessly model everyday within the gay community. I&#8217;m stepping out on my side, and &#8216;crazy enough&#8217; the gay community is responding to that boldness by boldly doing the same thing from theirs. And here we are today. It&#8217;s a shame to me that my theological belief in comparrison to how I live my life is so odd to most people. It should be the norm. Because from my perspective that is Kingdom stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.loveisanorientation.com/2010/part-7-united-kingdom/comment-page-1/#comment-2405</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loveisanorientation.com/?p=1059#comment-2405</guid>
		<description>Okay, I think I&#039;ve been misunderstanding you this whole time. You still believe, as most conservative Christians do, that homosexual behavior is sinful. Unless I&#039;m misunderstanding you now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I think I&#8217;ve been misunderstanding you this whole time. You still believe, as most conservative Christians do, that homosexual behavior is sinful. Unless I&#8217;m misunderstanding you now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

